| From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "'Thomas Lockhart'" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Date: | 2000-05-02 11:57:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C54A@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
As usual when replying from here, replies prefixed with PM:
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
Seems a JAR file is better than copying the class files. The README has
to be updated though. Also, your web page should be more prominent.
People may prefer downloading the JAR file themselves rather than do the
compile if they have kaffe.
PM: Yes, apart from special cases (mainly with applets) it's easier as
it's not just .class files that go into the .jar file.
PM: As for my site, I want to update the site but I've tried to put the
coding as a higher priority. If I can get this lot sorted, then I'll
switch to the site contents.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 12:00:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:54:14 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-02 12:00:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |
| Previous Message | Peter Mount | 2000-05-02 11:54:14 | RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status |