| From: | Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pgsql-Hackers (E-mail)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Inserting large objects |
| Date: | 2000-02-08 08:57:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C181@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Just a quick question, but has anyone inserted a large object with a
specific OID, rather than getting a new oid?
What I'm thinking of, is backing up the large objects in a database into
a zip file, then restoring them (if required).
This is for a new JDBC example. The backup is easy, but it's the
restoring that I can't see how it can be done with the current lo_
functions.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris | 2000-02-08 09:10:55 | How to make a patch? |
| Previous Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-02-08 08:44:32 | RE: [HACKERS] Bug in cursors?? |