| From: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. |
| Date: | 2014-02-19 15:21:12 |
| Message-ID: | 1ACC307196369B86FEDF7B82@apophis.credativ.lan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
--On 18. Februar 2014 22:23:59 +0200 Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
wrote:
> I considered it a new feature, so not back-patching was the default. If
> you want to back-patch it, I won't object.
That was my original feeling, too, but +1 for backpatching.
--
Thanks
Bernd
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2014-02-19 16:01:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-19 15:10:52 | pgsql: Further code review for pg_lsn data type. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2014-02-19 16:01:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql: Add a GUC to report whether data page checksums are enabled. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-02-19 15:11:45 | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |