Re: effective_cache_size and work_ram

From: "ac(at)hsk(dot)hk" <ac(at)hsk(dot)hk>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "ac(at)hsk(dot)hk" <ac(at)hsk(dot)hk>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size and work_ram
Date: 2012-12-12 08:06:43
Message-ID: 1A98C17E-7194-43C5-95B4-46F2A73C7E03@hsk.hk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi, yes it is a dedicated server. and THANKS!

On 12 Dec 2012, at 3:55 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> hello
>
> 2012/12/12 ac(at)hsk(dot)hk <ac(at)hsk(dot)hk>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a new server for PostgreSQL 9.2.2 with 8GB physical RAM, I want to
>> turn the server with the following changes from default:
>>
>> max_connections = 100 # default
>> shared_buffers = 2048MB # change from 24MB to 2048MB as I think 24MB is not
>> enough
>> maintenance_work_mem = 400MB # 50MB/GB x 8GB
>> effective_cache_size = 4096MB # Set to 50% of total RAM
>> work_mem = 24MB
>> checkpoint_segments = 10
>> wal_buffers = 16MB
>>
>> Are these values reasonable?
>
> it is dedicated server?
>
> then effective_cache_size can be higher maybe 6GB
>
> checkpoint_segments are too low, can be 128
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel Stehule
>
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> ac

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin French 2012-12-12 10:25:44 C Function Memory Management
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-12-12 07:55:25 Re: effective_cache_size and work_ram