Re: Allow an alias to be attached directly to a JOIN ... USING

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Georgios Kokolatos <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Allow an alias to be attached directly to a JOIN ... USING
Date: 2021-03-05 17:00:20
Message-ID: 19cab8ea-7106-2017-e018-d65feffb90ad@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/14/20 3:49 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-11-10 16:15, Georgios Kokolatos wrote:
>> I noticed that this patch fails on the cfbot.
>> For this, I changed the status to: 'Waiting on Author'.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> //Georgios
>>
>> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>
> Here is a rebased and lightly retouched patch.

There don't seem to be any objections to just documenting the slight
divergence from the spec.

So, does it make sense to just document that and proceed?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2021-03-05 17:13:28 Re: n_mod_since_analyze isn't reset at table truncation
Previous Message Pavel Biryukov 2021-03-05 16:55:18 Re: posgres 12 bug (partitioned table)