| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: cleanup temporary files after crash |
| Date: | 2021-03-19 03:07:05 |
| Message-ID: | 19bc3276-6280-43bd-d868-ab3cb146266a@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/19/21 3:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> So crake and florican seem to be happy now. Not sure about lapwing yet.
>> But interestingly enough, prion and curculio got unhappy. They worked
>> fine with the older test, but now it fails with the "no such file or
>> directory" message. I wonder what makes them different from the other
>> x86_64 machines ...
>
> I'm confused about why the new query would use a temp file at all.
> Maybe they aren't using the same plan?
>
Because generate_series() stashes the results into a tuplestore, and the
test sets work_mem to just 64kB. Maybe I'm missing some detail, though.
The plan is extremely simple - just Function Scan feeding data into an
Insert, not sure what other plan could be used.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-03-19 03:08:19 | Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-19 02:57:35 | Re: cleanup temporary files after crash |