Re: Why would writes to pgsql_tmp bottleneck at 1mb/s?

From: Aaron Birkland <birkie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why would writes to pgsql_tmp bottleneck at 1mb/s?
Date: 2005-03-09 01:13:29
Message-ID: 19ab0ccd05030817132e702cd4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Maybe I'm not an idiot (really!) even with almost 2GB of maintenance_mem, PG
> still writes to pgsql_tmp no faster than 2MB/s. I think there may be an
> artificial bottleneck there. Question is, PostgreSQL, OS or hardware?

I'm curious: what is your cpu usage while this is happening? I've
noticed similar slow index creation behaviour, but I did not make any
connection to pgsql_temp (because it was not on a separate partition).
I was indexing an oid field of a 700GB table and it took about four
days on a 1.2GHz UltraSparcIII (solaris 9, 8GB core). I noticed that
the one CPU that was pegged at near 100%, leading me to believe it
was CPU bound. Odd thing is that the same operation on a 2GHz Pentium
IV box (Linux) on the same data took about a day. Truss showed that
a great majority of that time was in userland.

-Aaron

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John A Meinel 2005-03-09 01:27:55 Re: pl/pgsql faster than raw SQL?
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2005-03-09 01:02:13 vacuum full, why multiple times ?