| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ed Loehr <ELOEHR(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 1999-12-26 00:13:26 |
| Message-ID: | 199912260013.TAA29685@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > > system that won't stay up consistently is approaching worthlessness
> > > for mission-critical 24x7 applications. And if the masses
> > > leave because of system reliability problems, you can be very,
> > > very certain about what they will tell their friends and coworkers.
> >
> > And we don't have a problem in this area, do we?
>
> Please tell me you're kidding.
We don't have roll-forward logging until 7.1, and require vacuum
regularly. Other than that, I don't know of any major issues.
Reliability has always been of primary importance. We wouldn't be where
we are today without reliability.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Clark C. Evans | 1999-12-26 01:43:44 | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 1999-12-25 23:23:26 | Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL |