Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL

> On Sat, 25 Dec 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Consider this:
> >
> > The stock market going crazy over Linux stocks
> > Interbase users are considering moving en-mass to PostgreSQL
> > Publishers are crawling all over each other to publish a PostgreSQL book

These three items represent three good signs:

Commercial success of a related technology
Increased user interest
Increased commercial interest

BTW, I forgot to mention that my web page at

> >
> > With these signs, it is possible we may be _very_ popular in the near
> > future. I am not sure this will happen, but I didn't think this would
> > happen to Linux.
>
> The worst thing we could do is to intentionally try to stay less than
> popular. There's a reason Linux is taking off and *BSD isn't really, and
> it's not technology. (Sorry, Marc.)

I think everyone can agree with that, including Marc.

>
> >
> > My big question is, what new challenges will we face as we become more
> > popular?
> >
> > Do we have the proper license? I know this has the possibility of
> > opening up a GPL vs. BSD slugfest. However, I will not let such a
> > discussion get out of control.
> >
> >
>
> One thing we should definitely attempt to do before 7.0 is write our own
> license or at least our own copyright in addition to the BSD license,
> since none of us (?) actually work at UCB.

We certainly have the power to add a license of our own. BSDI has done
this, as well as many other companies. I don't want to wait until
things get very busy and then try to address these issues. We may
decide we don't want to do anything, but I would like to decide that
now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026