Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on

> wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Dare I suggest that we should declare feature freeze *now*,
>
> > Only if the implementation of the temp file buffered deferred
> > trigger event queue isn't considered a feature,
>
> It's obviously a necessary fix. But no one seemed excited about an
> early feature freeze anyway, so disregard that comment...

Yes, Tom, I was wondering about your early freeze proposal. If we
freeze, we may as well start beta. However, I believe it was you who
suggested Feb 1 rather than Jan 1 because you wanted to clean up some
things.

So, I assume we are scheduled for a Feb 1 beta, and anything Jan can get
done by then should be added, including any working implementation of
foreign keys or long tuples.

It doesn't have to be 100% tested, just working. Testing is for the beta
period. And Jan, others are ready to assist you. I didn't understand
foreign keys, but I think I have an idea about long tuples.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026