| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed |
| Date: | 1999-12-20 04:40:52 |
| Message-ID: | 199912200440.XAA25315@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > We could argue that Postgres is the super-user for the database, it
> > should be zero userid.
>
> Actually, that's quite a good thought --- is there *any* real need
> for initdb to extract the UID of the postgres user? What we do need,
> I think, is the *name* of the postgres user, which we might perhaps
> get with something like
>
> whoami 2>/dev/null || id -u -n 2>/dev/null || echo postgres
We currently have:
EffectiveUser=`id -n -u 2> /dev/null` || EffectiveUser=`whoami 2> /dev/null`
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-20 05:24:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-20 04:19:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed |