| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Hickey <jhickey(at)impact1(dot)hpcc(dot)nectec(dot)or(dot)th> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Confirmation of feature of in version 7 |
| Date: | 1999-12-17 17:52:44 |
| Message-ID: | 199912171752.MAA17569@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hello all
>
> On another mailing list unassociated with postgres, someone posted a message
> indicating that in version 7.x, the 8k limit for tuple size was going to be
> eliminated. Can any of the developers confirm this?
>
> Thank you for your time.
Man, we can't keep any secrets. :-)
Until today, there was hope that we could eliminate that limit in 7.0,
which goes to beta on Feb 1. However, the group has decided to not
included that in 7.0 because the job is larger than anticipated. It
will certainly be in 7.1. We realize many people need that
functionality, and we clearly have a plan to implement it. In fact,
coding has already begun on it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marcin Inkielman | 1999-12-17 17:55:38 | [GENERAL] a problem with single char recoding |
| Previous Message | Justin Hickey | 1999-12-17 15:48:13 | Confirmation of feature of in version 7 |