From: | Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, wieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock |
Date: | 1999-12-16 19:24:35 |
Message-ID: | 199912161924.TAA17303@mtcc.demon.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> > Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> > > Since the new parallel regression tests I've always had a few
>> > > lock NOTICE messages like the following.
>> >
>> > Interesting --- I had not run the parallel test for a while,
>> > but I tried it just now and got half a dozen of these:
>> > NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock
>> > (Otherwise the tests all passed.)
>> >
>> > Something's been broken fairly recently. Does anyone have an
>> > idea what changed?
>>
>> Good question. I can't imagine what it would be. We didn't do much,
>> and parallel regression is not that old.
>
>
> Also, I used it after another dozen times without. Now I see
> them too. So I assume it was a recent change that introduced
> the problem.
I'm not sure it's that recent, I think I've had 1 or 2 such errors
ever since I've been running the "runcheck".
What I will say is that the parallel running arrived at around the
same time as the new psql and I didn't have an old version available
to run the tests until sometime after. (had to download and build 6.5!)
>
> And if not, much better. Would show that running all tests
> serialized had hidden a bug for a long time.
>
Quite possible, although something recent has aggrevated it somewhat ;-)
Keith.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tim Holloway | 1999-12-16 19:26:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. |
Previous Message | Ed Loehr | 1999-12-16 17:59:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data |