Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Date: 1999-12-12 22:54:06
Message-ID: 199912122254.RAA09994@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > It is agreed that Feb 1st is the beta date...it will not include WAL, but
> > will be numbered v7.0, with v7.1 going BETA as soon as Vadim feels
> > prepared with the WAL code...
>
> OK, it's decided. Let's quit arguing.
>
> > On Feb 1st, the CVS repository will be branched, like we did on the last
> > release, so that we can beta/debug 7.0 *without* interfering with
> > development on 7.1. This has proven to work quite well with v6.5.x,
>
> Actually, I thought what worked well was to postpone the branch as long
> as possible. Double-patching is no fun...

Ditto. Look at the 6_5 branch and you will see it was done far into the
6.5 release, not at the 6.5.0 release. I don't want to continue
mentioning this for every release.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-12-12 22:58:12 Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide
Previous Message Don Baccus 1999-12-12 22:53:13 Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide