Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct
Date: 1999-12-09 03:03:00
Message-ID: 199912090303.WAA03406@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Never mind. Fixed. I had forgotten to add a line to pg_amproc.h. So
> > obvious, hard to imagine how I could have missed it... :-)
>
> >> ERROR: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed
>
> This seems a mighty unhelpful error message for a missing pg_amproc
> entry. Perhaps whatever code is doing the amproc lookup ought to be
> checking for a failure and issuing a more specific message? I haven't
> looked to see whether that's practical or not...

Not practical. The lookup in fmgr is far away from the rd_strategy load
failure.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-09 03:20:14 Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements?
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-12-09 03:01:24 Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf