Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
Date: 1999-12-09 02:55:35
Message-ID: 199912090255.VAA03055@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Question 3: Is there a reason why the template1 database is vacuumed twice
> in the process? Once before all the views are created (no analyze) and
> once at the very end (with analyze).

I see the line before the first vacuum:

# If the COPY is first, the VACUUM generates an error, so we vacuum first

That may have been me adding this. Seems it is no longer an issue.
Removed.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-12-09 03:01:24 Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-09 02:54:16 Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies