| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | cache question |
| Date: | 1999-11-22 06:33:55 |
| Message-ID: | 199911220633.BAA18140@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
table? I am trying to make pg_opclass unique. We have a cache on
pg_opclass.opcname, so we clearly have a problem here.
Also, is it safe to set opcdeftype to a non-zero value so I can make
that index unique too?
This stuff confusing.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-22 06:50:50 | Re: [HACKERS] cache question |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-11-22 05:19:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Reproducible vacuum complaint! |