From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL |
Date: | 1999-11-19 04:58:19 |
Message-ID: | 199911190458.XAA25578@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> At 11:19 PM 11/18/99 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> > We currently only allow the words PRIMARY KEY on a SERIAL column.
> >>
> >> Say what? There are ColConstraintElem and ConstraintElem productions
> >> for PRIMARY KEY ... are they broken?
> >>
> >> regards, tom lane
> >>
> >
> >Oh, I see it now. The grammer seems to only support it in SERIAL, but I
> >see it works now. I guess i am surprised SERIAL PRIMARY creates the
> >index and sequence, while INTEGER PRIMARY only creates the index.
>
> Oops, I guess I blew it by responding to a post by Bruce assuming he
> was right.
Seems I can't realy on understanding what we support by just looking at
gram.y.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-11-19 05:40:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |
Previous Message | Aaron J. Seigo | 1999-11-19 04:48:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert |