From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] regression tests |
Date: | 1999-11-17 16:04:42 |
Message-ID: | 199911171604.LAA11548@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I took Peter Eisentraut's advice and did it with the old pslq
> > (thanks for the hint).
> >
> > This problem (as expected) remains and happens in the temp
> > test. The two notices occur on creating the temp table and
> > the index on it. After that, the database connection get's
> > lost on the attempt to drop the temp table.
> >
> > Since the postmaster is doing recovery then, the numeric test
> > hasn't been run. All other tests are still O.K.
> >
> > The question is, who did something that could cause this
> > error?
>
> I am sure it was me changing the temp behavior. I will look at it.
Jan, I can't reproduce the temp regression failure here. I did make
changes yesterday morning to this. I assume you have an updated cvs,
right?
Anyway to make the default numeric regression test run faster. It seems
to take quite a while compared to the others.
We certainly need someone to update the regression tests to match the
new format so people can continue running regression tests before
applying patches.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aaron J. Seigo | 1999-11-17 16:10:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-11-17 15:52:40 | Re: [HACKERS] regression tests |