Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Karel Zak - Zakkr <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields
Date: 1999-11-12 17:10:35
Message-ID: 199911121710.MAA16458@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > Bruce suggested the contrib area, but I'm not sure if that's
> > the right place. If it goes into the distribution at all, I'd
> > like to use this data type for rule plan strings and function
> > source text in the system catalogs.
>
> Right, if we are going to bother with it at all, we should put it
> into the core so that we can use it for rule plans.

Agreed. I suggested contrib so the code doesn't just disappear.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gov-boi 1999-11-12 17:32:13 www.hack.co.za - exploit archives updates - 0day
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-12 17:00:27 Re: failure of \e in psql