| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. |
| Date: | 1999-10-26 17:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 199910261738.NAA28034@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Can we use only NULL, and not '' please? Seems clearer. I don't like
> > us of '' for any special handling. Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
> > maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
> > 19026
> >
>
> I agree with you, an empty string is a goofy way to drop a comment.
> The only reason I did it that way was because that's how Oracle does
> it (heck, why not create comment on, drop comment on). The question is,
> what should the behavior be when a user supplies an empty string?
>
> COMMENT ON TABLE employees IS '';
>
> Should the above add an empty comment to pg_description?
OK, I like the compatability issue. Let's leave both as dropping
comments, but only document the NULL case. SGML already updated.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Holloway | 1999-10-26 23:14:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Logging - pg_options format change? |
| Previous Message | Mike Mascari | 1999-10-26 17:16:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. |