Re: Planning final assault on query length limits

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning final assault on query length limits
Date: 1999-10-21 13:16:57
Message-ID: 19991021151657.A390@fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ecpg's lexer needs the same fixes recently applied to parser/scan.l to
> eliminate a fixed-size literal buffer and allow flex's input buffer to

I see.

> grow as needed. Michael Meskes usually handles ecpg --- Michael, do
> you want to deal with this issue or shall I take a cut at it?

I'm currently very busy, so I guess it will take some some until I can
tackle this problem. So if you have some spare time left I have no problem
if you make these changes. Otherwise I will once I find time.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-10-21 13:32:53 Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-10-21 09:52:55 Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour?