From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planning final assault on query length limits |
Date: | 1999-10-21 13:16:57 |
Message-ID: | 19991021151657.A390@fam-meskes.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:38:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ecpg's lexer needs the same fixes recently applied to parser/scan.l to
> eliminate a fixed-size literal buffer and allow flex's input buffer to
I see.
> grow as needed. Michael Meskes usually handles ecpg --- Michael, do
> you want to deal with this issue or shall I take a cut at it?
I'm currently very busy, so I guess it will take some some until I can
tackle this problem. So if you have some spare time left I have no problem
if you make these changes. Otherwise I will once I find time.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De | Use PostgreSQL!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-21 13:32:53 | Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-10-21 09:52:55 | Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? |