From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>, petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] |
Date: | 1999-10-20 16:09:04 |
Message-ID: | 199910201609.MAA03476@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> That is fine if contrib includes no GPL code; if it does, I need to
> >> distribute the code for that portion only. Thus, if we want to
> >> maintain as broad a potential as possible (including non-source
> >> distributions) we need to encourage adoption of the BSD license for
> >> all source.
>
> > But Alladin Ghostscript is distributed in source form.
>
> But not *only* in source form. Aladdin make their living by selling
> Ghostscript to printer manufacturers and so forth. The printer makers
> are not about to ship out printers with copies of source code, nor
> even with notices explaining where to get the printer source code.
> If they obtained Ghostscript under GPL then they'd have to make not
> only the PS interpreter source available, but probably the entire
> firmware for the printer (it's a derived work, no?) and they are
> certainly not about to do that. So they pay Aladdin for the rights
> to use Ghostscript with a commercial license instead of GPL.
Oh, I didn't realize they had a binary-only distribution that was
_different_ from the source distribution.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 1999-10-20 16:26:19 | RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-20 15:57:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |