From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Date: | 1999-10-19 21:45:54 |
Message-ID: | 199910192145.RAA14533@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Huh? We certainly do --- or have you missed that
> > * Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
> > that's plastered across all the source files?
>
> Regarding which I have a question: at other locations I see (c) 1994-7
> Univ. of California, or even (c) 1996-9 PostgreSQL Global Development
> Team.
>
> I am not an expert in any of this, but I'm just wondering: when did the
> involvement of the U of C end, when was the Global Development Team (tm)
> formed and do both copyrights exits in parallel? What if someone
> contributes something really major and fairly independent (say like
> pg_access) and wants to keep his own copyright (with compatible license of
> course)?
>
> And is the PostgreSQL Global Development Team any real entity that could
> theoretically enforce that copyright or is it just an alias for "whoever
> contributed"?
Now there's a good question. How long does the BSD imprint remain. I
assume forever. It is still on BSD/OS files. Only the ones they right
from scrath get a BSDI imprint.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-19 21:49:58 | Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-19 21:42:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |