Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Date: 1999-10-08 17:06:10
Message-ID: 199910081706.NAA28701@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hmm. I see a problem coming up for myself :(
>
> I'm working on JOIN syntax and (hopefully) OUTER JOIN capabilities for
> the next release. That will take a lot of time afaik. We also have
> lots of great new features (almost certainly) coming up, such as WAL
> and RI. Lots of stuff, and taken together it should lead to a v7.0
> release.
>
> However! I've been waiting for v7.0 to do internal remapping of the
> datetime types (and possibly other types; I'm not remembering right
> now) so that the 4-byte TIMESTAMP becomes, internally, what is
> currently DATETIME and so that the current DATETIME becomes a synonym
> for TIMESTAMP. If we are releasing v7.0 rather than v6.6, then I
> should work on that now to ensure it is completed. If we might release
> as v6.6, I should continue to work on OUTER JOIN, since the type
> changes shouldn't go in yet.
>
> Any opinions/comments on the right path to take? With code changes and
> docs changes I would think that the datetime stuff is two or a few
> weeks work with my off-work time, which I suppose wouldn't impace a
> release schedule too much...

My guess is 7.0. With the minor releases still being made, Marc is in
no rush.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-08 17:15:56 Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-08 16:33:36 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion