| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Roberto Cornacchia <rcorna(at)tin(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion |
| Date: | 1999-10-08 16:19:31 |
| Message-ID: | 199910081619.MAA26171@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Yes, you have the crux of the issue. I wrote it because it was the best
> > thing I could think of, but it is non-optimimal. Because all the
> > optimal solutions seemed too slow to me, I couldn't think of a better
> > one.
>
> Thank you, Tom and Bruce.
> This is not a good news for us :-(. In any case, is 1/disbursion the
> best estimate we can have by now, even if not optimal?
That is the best one maintained by the database.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-08 16:20:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-10-08 15:07:33 | Features for next release |