Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison

From: "Matthias Urlichs" <smurf(at)noris(dot)de>
To: Michael Widenius <monty(at)monty(dot)pp(dot)sci(dot)fi>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Martin Ramsch <m(dot)ramsch(at)computer(dot)org>, MySQL mailing list <mysql(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com>, postgresql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, randyboy <randyboy(at)whispers(dot)blackmist(dot)org>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick(at)stealthgeeks(dot)net>, Scott Perkins <2scott(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, mcgarry(at)tig(dot)com(dot)au
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date: 1999-10-07 14:41:28
Message-ID: 19991007164128.C9403@noris.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

Michael Widenius:
> Bruce> Seems we will downgrade it to a warning. Too many people misunderstand
> Bruce> HAVING vs. WHERE, so a nice warning would help new users.
>
> Should you really give a warning for something that is correct ANSI SQL ?
>
If people mix up HAVING and WHERE, the problem seems to be mainly that
somebody has told them about the existence of HAVING way too early.

--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf(at)noris(dot)de | ICQ: 20193661
The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://www.noris.de/~smurf/
--
JOB INTERVIEW:
The excruciating process during which personnel officers
separate the wheat from the chaff -- then hire the chaff.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Max Buvry 1999-10-07 15:15:00 [Q] TRIGGER-RULE
Previous Message Michael Widenius 1999-10-07 13:36:04 Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison