From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments |
Date: | 1999-10-06 22:22:35 |
Message-ID: | 199910062222.SAA23693@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Anyway, I'm going to end up rewriting that parser anyway, so that will be
> taken care of. I was almost about to use flex but the Windows crowd
> probably wouldn't find that too funny. (The Windows crowd won't find this
> thing funny anyway, since I have no clue what #ifdef's I need for that.
> Someone else will have to do a looong compile&fix session.)
>
> The question I have though is, is there a reason, besides efficiency, that
> psql doesn't just send the comment to the backend with the query? The
> backend does accept comments last time I checked. Perhaps someone will one
> day write something that makes some use of those comments on the backend
> (thus conflicting with the very definition of "comment", but maybe a
> logger) and it would remove some load out of psql.
Remove it. Send it to the backend.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-10-06 22:28:32 | WAL Bootstrap/Startup/Shutdown committed... |
Previous Message | sszabo | 1999-10-06 20:19:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Database names with space (II) |