| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | monty(at)tcx(dot)se |
| Cc: | Martin Ramsch <m(dot)ramsch(at)computer(dot)org>, MySQL mailing list <mysql(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com>, postgresql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, randyboy <randyboy(at)whispers(dot)blackmist(dot)org>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick(at)stealthgeeks(dot)net>, Scott Perkins <2scott(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, mcgarry(at)tig(dot)com(dot)au |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Date: | 1999-10-06 16:19:22 |
| Message-ID: | 199910061619.MAA12301@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> It would be very nice you could add to the above the features that
> MySQL has that postgreSQL is missing. PostgreSQL does have some
> features that MySQL lacks, but MySQL does support a lot of ODBC and
> ANSI SQL things that postgreSQL doesn't support. We have also put a
> lot of effort in MySQL to implement a lot of useful functions from a
> lot of different SQL servers. This is why MySQL 'shows off' on
> crash-me; If someone else has some useful functionality/syntax, we also try
> to support it!
I can't go listing tons of things in this one paragraph. Can you
suggest some wording, and maybe I can merge it in? We don't want to say
anything about MySQL in a disparaging way.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-06 17:06:33 | Re: [GENERAL] what happened to pgaccess under 6.5.2? |
| Previous Message | Michael Plump | 1999-10-06 15:37:47 | Re: [GENERAL] You are really hosed. |