| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Date: | 1999-10-06 13:45:27 |
| Message-ID: | 199910061345.JAA08594@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I will try the patch of bruce for the comment part. It shouldn't be the
> > > way that the perl module is stripping the comments of the querie
> > > but it is possible and if it is possible it will be a bug in the DBD
> > > postgresql perl module.
> >
> > Maybe we should support the HAVING without aggregates. What do others
> > think?
>
> If we are the only one that doesn't, it just makes it harder for those
> moving from Oracle/Informix/etc if they happen to be using such queries...
>
> How hard would it be to implement?
Not hard. I will add it to the TODO list.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-10-06 13:47:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-10-06 13:43:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |