Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1
Date: 1999-09-27 19:31:53
Message-ID: 199909271931.PAA12551@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Most of the activities after "Second" next step can be
> done parallel. I'll commit my changes after that, because
> then I'm able to run a full test of deferred constraints
> to be sure I'm really on the right track. All co-
> developers can join then using the CURRENT tree.
>
> Any comments?

Great. How's that for a comment? :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-27 19:41:43 Re: [HACKERS] Files ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-27 19:26:08 Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions