Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?]
Date: 1999-09-27 15:33:33
Message-ID: 199909271533.LAA15302@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I have done it many times. I profile that postgres process, not
> > the backend.
>
> Hmm, isn't Postgres process called backend process? AFAIK postmaster
> (it's simply a nickname to Postgres) forks itself on receiveing new
> connection request. Isn't it true? I mean that Postmaster is the same
> binary as Postgres itself.

Yes.

>
> > Look for this in Makefile.global:
> >
> > # Comment out PROFILE to generate a profile version of the binaries
> > #PROFILE= -p -non_shared
> >
>
> Of course I used -p option. The problem is, when I start Postmaster,
> it complains about 'profile timer expired'. What do I do wrong?

That's strange. I have not profiled in a while. I wonder if the
removal of the exec() has caused this.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-09-27 15:35:16 RE: [HACKERS] Lexxing and yaccing...
Previous Message Lamar Owen 1999-09-27 15:30:12 Re: New init script and upgrade attempt: failed