Re: [HACKERS] Re: attdisbursiont

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: attdisbursiont
Date: 1999-09-18 01:34:11
Message-ID: 199909180134.VAA02888@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> As far as I can see, the only thing that's really at stake here is not
> hardwiring the semantics of the operator names "<", "=", ">" into the
> system. While that'd be nice from a cleanliness/data-type-independence
> point of view, it's not clear that it has any real practical
> significance. Any data type designer who didn't make "=" mean equals
> ought to be shot anyway ;-). So upon second thought I think I'd put
> this *way* down the to-do list...

Removed from TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-18 01:35:00 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-09-17 21:47:41 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused