| From: | "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)wallace(dot)ece(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump table order |
| Date: | 1999-09-13 01:35:27 |
| Message-ID: | 19990912203527.B20044@wallace.ece.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 08:18:56PM -0500, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
>
> Ah I think I just figured it out: it's that pesky object
> support, isn't it? In order to use a table (class) as a member (field)
> of another table, it has to exist first, and the only thing in the
> system table that ensures that is oid. Bummer. Hmm, it'd still be useful
Talking to myself: "Gee Ross, why don't you read the friendly comments
in the source you just found the ordey by oid in, explaining exactly
this point?"
Ross "the blind"
--
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-09-13 02:05:35 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump table order |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 1999-09-13 01:18:56 | pg_dump table order |