Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>
Cc: Michael Richards <miker(at)scifair(dot)acadiau(dot)ca>, "pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries
Date: 1999-08-25 17:19:43
Message-ID: 199908251719.NAA21519@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> Michael Richards wrote:
>
> > We're currently testing a system with about 1.2 million records with 6.5
> > and it outperforms SQL server 6 by quite a lot. It's running on a dual P3
> > with a 4 9.1 gig Cheetah array on a DPT controller running RAID0. I'm
> > pretty happy with it...
> >
> >
>
> Great balls of fire! A dual P3 with a four 9.1 Gig RAID0 Cheetah array?
> That's fantastic! How much did that set you back? Are there any special
> quirks about using Postgres on a multiple processor, multiple disk
> system?

No quirks. Our multi-Unix-process model for each backend makes
multi-cpu's work great. In fact, multi-threading, which mysql uses to
put multiple backends in a single unix process, can be a pain to get
working on a multi-cpu system unless the OS can handle threads across
multiple cpu processes.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tjk@tksoft.com 1999-08-25 17:42:12 Re: [SQL] harddisk crash
Previous Message G. Anthony Reina 1999-08-25 16:59:30 Re: [SQL] 2 million+ entries