| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Finn Kettner <fk(at)akf(dot)dk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Long table names |
| Date: | 1999-08-16 18:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 199908161801.OAA06503@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Hi there.
>
> I remember someone talking about compiling pgsql so that it could use
> table names longer than 32 bytes, but that it would require some
> changes in the source code. Could anyone tell me what changes these
> are, and how safe it would be to do it (that is, should I assume that
> I could just compile a newer version making the same changes to the
> sources, and have anyone experienced anything broken using the longer
> table names)???
>
> Yours faithfully.
> Finn Kettner.
> PS. The main reasong for the longer table names is not the tables
> themself, but the indexes etc. that are constructed automatically
> using e.g. serial fields.
That serial table name is fixed in 6.5.*.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Theo Kramer | 1999-08-16 18:22:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-08-16 17:53:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types |