| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend |
| Date: | 1999-08-13 17:03:43 |
| Message-ID: | 199908131703.NAA08899@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Hmmm, I've had pretty bad experiences with cursors on Informix Online. When
> many clients use cursors on large result sets the system (even on big iron)
> grinds to a halt. Luckily you can fetch a single row at a time on a normal
> select with Informix so that solved that. It does appear, however, that
> Postgres does not create huge overheads for cursors, but I would still like
> to see what happens when many clients do a cursor select...
I believe later Informix ODBC version cache the query reqults in the sql
server in case they are needed later. Terrible for performance. I have
clients downgrade to older isql clients.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | G. Anthony Reina | 1999-08-13 17:28:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-08-13 16:54:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? |