Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages

From: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Date: 1999-08-10 15:04:12
Message-ID: 199908101504.QAA26145@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>As long as we install into /usr/local/pgsql/man/man*, naming conflicts
>with other packages aren't too big a deal --- there's no physical file
>conflict, and people can just add or remove /usr/local/pgsql/man/ in
>their MANPATH settings to see or not see Postgres manpages.

But do remember us poor distribution maintainers. It makes life a lot
easier for us if upstream writers make an effort not to conflict with the
rest of the world!

If some local user or administrator puts PostgreSQL on his machine, it
may be appropriate to use /usr/local, but a PostgreSQL package installed as
part of a distribution should never use it.

--
Vote against SPAM: http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
========================================
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ye shall
ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you."
John 15:7

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-08-10 15:18:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-10 15:01:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages