Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries
Date: 1999-08-05 15:07:28
Message-ID: 199908051507.LAA26036@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Someone was just complaining over in the sql list about the poor
> performance of
>
> select name,description from descriptions
> where name in (select name
> from descriptions
> where description like '%Bankverbindung%');
>
> Since the inner query is uncorrelated with the outer, there's really
> no need to execute it more than once, but currently it's re-executed
> each time through the outer plan.
>
> I wonder whether it wouldn't be a good idea to force a Materialize
> node to be added to the top of an uncorrelated subplan? Then at
> least the re-executions would be pretty cheap...

Yes, the subqueries need work. We don't even do index lookups into the
inner plan, only sequential. Already on TODO. The multiple query
executions are not on the TODO list. Not sure why this is happening
here.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-08-05 15:13:59 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-08-05 14:53:15 New man pages