From: | Michael J Schout <mschout(at)mail(dot)gkg-com(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PORTS] HP-UX port |
Date: | 1999-07-30 19:22:18 |
Message-ID: | 199907301922.OAA32520@mail.gkg-com.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
> Michael J Schout <mschout(at)mail(dot)gkg-com(dot)com> writes:
> > and the actual results are:
> > QUERY: SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL
> > WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120;
> > random
> > ------
> > 123
> > (1 row)
>
> > Which looks like a genuine bug to me :).
>
> No, that's expected behavior, actually. The random test wouldn't be
> random if it didn't fail occasionally :-). The parameters are set so
I agree :). When I qlanced at it the first time, I missed the "NOT" in the
query, so I didnt think that 123 should have been returned at all, which is
obviously false :). It looks like the regressions are okay then, which is
a relief :).
...
> Interesting. May or may not be a 64-bit issue; it might be a problem
> with the machine-dependent spinlock code. Check out
> src/include/storage/s_lock.h and src/backend/storage/buffer/s_lock.c.
Ill hopefully get some time next week to look at this. I'll let you know
if I can figure it out :)
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-07-30 21:37:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-30 17:59:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha! |