| From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Dalphin <mdalphin(at)amgen(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Is "OFFSET" a reserved word? |
| Date: | 1999-07-30 18:10:00 |
| Message-ID: | 199907301810.OAA02189@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Hi,
>
> My old DB schema which worked up thru Postgresql ver 6.4.2 has been broken in
> ver 6.5.1 (running on an SGI).
>
> CREATE TABLE Seq (
> .....
> Offset int not null,
> ....
> );
>
> now fails with a parse error at 'offset'. I don't see this word listed in the
> reserved words page. When I change the word to SeqOffset, the schema works fine.
Yes, now OFFSET is reserved:
SELECT * FROM tab LIMIT 100 OFFSET 3
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Popov | 1999-07-31 08:15:18 | Search |
| Previous Message | Mark Dalphin | 1999-07-30 17:40:54 | Is "OFFSET" a reserved word? |