Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Date: 1999-07-20 17:15:53
Message-ID: 199907201715.NAA29491@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> >> Maybe it is time to swallow hard and redesign the querytree
> >> representation?
>
> > Well, while you do that keep in mind outer joins.
>
> While *I* redesign it? I barely know what an outer join is.
>
> I'm happy to kibitz while someone else redesigns it, but I don't
> think I'm qualified to be the lead dog...

Did you want to do the change for UNION, or were you just suggesting it
be done? I can easily add it to the TODO list.

Done:

* redesign UNION structures to have separarate target lists.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-20 17:23:01 Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] Counting bool flags in a complex query
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-07-20 17:00:15 Re: [HACKERS] CREATE VERSION