From: | Jim Rowan <jmr(at)computing(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | WHERE clause? |
Date: | 1999-07-14 05:17:12 |
Message-ID: | 199907140517.AAA23407@zee.computing.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
I'm trying to create a log table to track changes to a table.. so I've
created a set of rules that look something like this:
CREATE RULE "m_log_change" AS ON UPDATE TO "machine"
do (
INSERT INTO machine_log (who, date, machnum, col, newval)
SELECT getpgusername(), 'now'::text, old.machnum,
'host', new.host
WHERE (new.host != old.host) or
(old.host IS NOT NULL and new.host IS NULL) or
(old.host IS NULL and new.host IS NOT NULL);
... more similar INSERT statements with different WHERE clauses..
);
My question is:
Is this the best way to code the WHERE? What I'm really after is "did the
value change?". I found that the tests to see if one-but-not-both of the
values is NULL are required to identify times when the value changed to or
from NULL.
Seems like a lot of extra work...
Jim Rowan DCSI DCE/DFS/Sysadmin Consulting
jmr(at)computing(dot)com (512) 374-1143
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | webmaster | 1999-07-14 08:52:10 | Few questions about my slow query |
Previous Message | Johann Spies | 1999-07-14 04:58:05 | OFF-TOPIC: Postgresql for NT? |