Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size
Date: 1999-07-09 18:01:09
Message-ID: 199907091801.OAA06493@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Done. Thanks.

> >
> >I knew there had to be a reason that some tests where BLCKSZ/2 and some
> >BLCKSZ.
> >
> >Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow index on tuple greater than 1/2 block size
> >
> >Seems we have to allow columns over 1/2 block size for now. Most people
> >wouln't index on them.
>
>
> Since an index header page has to point to at least 2 other leaf or
> header pages, it stores at least 2 keys per page.
>
> I would alter the todo to say:
>
> * fix btree to give a useful elog when key > 1/2 (page - overhead) and not
> abort
>
> to fix the:
> >
> > FATAL 1: btree: failed to add item to the page
> >
>
> A key of more than 4k will want a more efficient index type than btree
> for such data anyway.
>
> Andreas
>
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-07-09 19:48:59 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-09 18:00:10 6.5.1