From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas <andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size |
Date: | 1999-07-09 18:01:09 |
Message-ID: | 199907091801.OAA06493@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Done. Thanks.
> >
> >I knew there had to be a reason that some tests where BLCKSZ/2 and some
> >BLCKSZ.
> >
> >Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Allow index on tuple greater than 1/2 block size
> >
> >Seems we have to allow columns over 1/2 block size for now. Most people
> >wouln't index on them.
>
>
> Since an index header page has to point to at least 2 other leaf or
> header pages, it stores at least 2 keys per page.
>
> I would alter the todo to say:
>
> * fix btree to give a useful elog when key > 1/2 (page - overhead) and not
> abort
>
> to fix the:
> >
> > FATAL 1: btree: failed to add item to the page
> >
>
> A key of more than 4k will want a more efficient index type than btree
> for such data anyway.
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-07-09 19:48:59 | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-09 18:00:10 | 6.5.1 |