Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ???

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ???
Date: 1999-07-09 17:36:14
Message-ID: 199907091736.NAA05551@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yes, I caught this when you made that comment about the LIMIT test. I
> am checking all the other HAVE_ tests.

OK, patch reapplyed, and change made to #define test, and default
MAX/MIN values. It works fine now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-09 17:57:54 Re: [HACKERS] Regression Test fail to run if PLPGSQL in template1
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas 1999-07-09 17:28:15 Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size