Re: [GENERAL] What happened to the "&&" operator?

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] What happened to the "&&" operator?
Date: 1999-07-08 00:36:32
Message-ID: 199907080036.UAA17934@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


FYI, this will be fixed in 6.5.

> I'm just installing 6.5 and I did a dump/restore of a database that I
> had in 6.4.2. This database has a field with a box type which is
> indexed with an r-tree index. The dump/restore went OK, but when I
> tried to run a query against it, I got a weird error:
>
> ERROR: Operator 500 must have a restriction selectivity estimator to be
> used in a btree index
>
> This may not seem like a weird error to some, but why am I getting a
> b-tree error on an r-tree index?
> Anybody know anything about this?
>
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Ordway 1999-07-08 01:11:25 mailing list
Previous Message Roderick A. Anderson 1999-07-07 21:17:14 Re: [GENERAL] July 1999 issue of Sys Admin