Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stupor Genius <stuporg(at)erols(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
Date: 1999-07-04 04:27:44
Message-ID: 199907040427.AAA20813@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is? Is it sort of
> > BLCKSZ or BLCKSZ/2? I don't remember if we require the ability to have
> > at least two tuples in a block.
>
> IIRC, the max tuple size was always intended to be BLCKSZ, it's just the max
> size of the text fields that were 4096. I don't remember any discussions
> ever on this list about trying to control the # of tuples stored per block.
>

That is what I found too, but vacuum seems to use BLCKSZ/2, varchar uses
BLCKSZ/2, and tuple size is BLCKSZ. Doesn't make any sense.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-04 05:04:46 Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
Previous Message Stupor Genius 1999-07-04 03:24:21 RE: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit