From: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stupor Genius <stuporg(at)erols(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |
Date: | 1999-07-04 04:27:44 |
Message-ID: | 199907040427.AAA20813@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is? Is it sort of
> > BLCKSZ or BLCKSZ/2? I don't remember if we require the ability to have
> > at least two tuples in a block.
>
> IIRC, the max tuple size was always intended to be BLCKSZ, it's just the max
> size of the text fields that were 4096. I don't remember any discussions
> ever on this list about trying to control the # of tuples stored per block.
>
That is what I found too, but vacuum seems to use BLCKSZ/2, varchar uses
BLCKSZ/2, and tuple size is BLCKSZ. Doesn't make any sense.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-04 05:04:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |
Previous Message | Stupor Genius | 1999-07-04 03:24:21 | RE: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |