Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Date: 1999-06-29 13:33:31
Message-ID: 199906291333.JAA20593@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> needs 4 cycles instead of 10 (because the decimal point has
> the same meaning in base 10000 the last value is stored
> internally as short ints 1, 2030, 1234, 5000). This is the
> worst case and it still saved 60% of the innermost cycles!

Interesting. How do other Db's do it internally? Anyone know?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-06-29 14:05:08 Re: [HACKERS] acl problem in NetBSD/m68k
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-06-29 10:48:05 Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time