Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status

> > I think we did pretty well.
>
> First time for last two years -:)).

Yes, Tom, this is not typical for post-release. Your helping
certainly contributed to this quietness.

>
> > > What do people want to do now? Does anyone want to start on 6.6? Do we
> > > want to release 6.5.1? Should we relax for a few more weeks and bask in
> > > the stable release?
> >
> > IMHO we do need to make a 6.5.1 release --- I know I have a couple of
> > stupid bugs in 6.5 :-(. But it is not urgent; we could wait another
> > couple of weeks and see if anything else pops up.
> >
> > Probably the nearer decision is when to split the tree for 6.6.
> > Is anyone ready to start on new stuff for 6.6? The argument that
> > we wanted to avoid double-patching is looking less compelling with
> > so few patches, so I'm ready to see a tree split as soon as anyone
> > has anything to commit into 6.6 only...
>
> I have nothing yet. But I just made changes to avoid
> disk writes for read-only transactions (now speed of
> selects is the same as with -F) - should I put it
> in 6.5.1 or wait for 6.6?

If you are happy with it, would be nice for 6.5.1. Should speed things
up very much.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026