Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: SAKAIDA <sakaida(at)psn(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Date: 1999-06-28 18:30:53
Message-ID: 199906281830.OAA19695@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Oh, I didn't realize this. We certainly should think about reducing the
> > time spent on it, though it is kind of lame to be testing numeric in a
> > precision that is less than the standard int4 type.
>
> We certainly should think about a general speedup of NUMERIC.

How would we do that? I assumed it was already pretty optimized.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-28 18:37:44 Re: [HACKERS] regression bigtest needs very long time
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-06-28 17:26:52 Re: Perl library (was Building Postgres)